% vim: ft=tex \section{Implementation} This chapter discusses how the concepts introduced before are implemented into a simulator. Futher the infrastructure around the simulation and some tools are explained. The implementation is written as a \lstinline{python3} module. This allows users to quickly construct circuit, apply them to a state and measure amplitudes. Full access to the state (including intermediate) state has been priorized over execution speed. To keep the simulation speed as high as possible under these constraints some parts are implemented in \lstinline{C} \subsection{Dense State Vector Simulation} \subsubsection{Representation of Dense State Vectors} Recalling \eqref{eq:ci} any $n$-qbit state can be represented as a $2^n$ component vector in the integer state basis. This representation has some useful features when it comes to computations: \begin{itemize} \item{The projection on the integer states is trivial.} \item{For any qbit $j$ and $0 \le i \le 2^n-1$ the coefficient $c_i$ is part of the $\ket{1}_j$ amplitude iff $i \& (1 << j)$ and part of the $\ket{0}_j$ amplitude otherwise.} \item{For a qbit $j$ the coefficients $c_i$ and $c_{i \hat{} (1 << j)}$ are the conjugated coefficients.} \end{itemize} Where $\hat{}$ is the binary XOR, $\&$ the binary AND and $<<$ the binary leftshift operator. While implementing the dense state vectors two key points were allowing a simple and readable way to use them and simple access to the states by users that want more information than an abstracted view could allow. To meet both requirements the states are implemented as Python objects providing abstract features such as normalization checking, checking for sufficient qbit number when applying a circuit, computing overlaps with other states, a stringify method and stored measurement results. To store the measurement results a NumPy \lstinline{int8} array \cite{numpy_array} is used; this is called the classical state. The Python states also have a NumPy \lstinline{cdouble} array that stores the quantum mechanical state. Using NumPy arrays has the advantage that access to the data is simple and safe while operations on the states can be implemented in \lstinline{C} \cite{numpy_ufunc} providing a considerable speedup. This quantum mechanical state is the component vector in integer basis therefore it has $2^n$ components. Storing those components is acceptable in a range from $1$ to $30$ qbits; above this range the state requires space in the order of $1 \mbox{ GiB}$ which is in the range of usual RAM sizes for personal computers. For higher qbit numbers moving to high performance computers and other simulators is necessary. \subsubsection{Gates} Gates on dense state vectors are implemented as NumPy Universal Functions (ufuncs) \cite{numpy_ufunc} mapping a classical and a quantum state to a new classical state, a new quantum state and a $64 \mbox{ bit}$ integer indicating what qbits have been measured. Using ufuncs has the great advantage that managing memory is done by NumPy and an application programmer just has to implement the logic of the function. Because ufuncs are written in \lstinline{C} they provide a considerable speedup compared to an implementation in Python. The logic of gates is usually easy to implement using the integer basis. The example below implements the Hadamard gate \ref{ref:singleqbitgates}: \adjustbox{max width=\textwidth}{\lstinputlisting[language=C, firstline=153, lastline=178]{../pyqcs/src/pyqcs/gates/implementations/basic_gates.c}} A basic set of gates is implemented in PyQCS: \begin{itemize} \item{Hadamard $H$ gate.} \item{Pauli $X$ or \textit{NOT} gate.} \item{Pauli $Z$ gate.} \item{The $S$ phase gate.} \item{$Z$ rotation $R_\phi$ gate.} \item{Controlled $X$ gate: $CX$.} \item{Controlled $Z$ gate: $CZ$.} \item{The measurement "gate" $M$.} \end{itemize} To allow the implementation of possible hardware related gates the class \lstinline{GenericGate} takes a unitary $2\times2$ matrix as a NumPy \lstinline{cdouble} array and builds a gate from it. \subsubsection{Circuits} As mentioned in \ref{ref:quantum_circuits} quantum circuits are central in quantum programming. In the implementation great care was taken to make writing circuits as convenient and readable as possible. Users will almost never access the actual gates that perform the operation on a state; instead they will handle circuits.\\ Circuits can be applied to a state by multiplying them from the left on a state object: \begin{lstlisting}[language=Python] new_state = circuit * state \end{lstlisting} The elementary gates such as $H, R_\phi, CX$ are implemented as single gate circuits and can be constructing using the built-in generators. The generators take the act-qbit as first argument, parameters such as the control qbit or an angle as second argument: %\adjustbox{max width=\textwidth}{ \begin{lstlisting}[language=Python] In [1]: from pyqcs import CX, CZ, H, R, Z, X ...: from pyqcs import State ...: ...: state = State.new_zero_state(2) ...: intermediate_state = H(0) * state ...: ...: bell_state = CX(1, 0) * intermediate_state In [2]: bell_state Out[2]: (0.7071067811865476+0j)*|0b0> + (0.7071067811865476+0j)*|0b11> \end{lstlisting} %} Large circuits can be constructed using the binary OR operator \lstinline{|} in an analogy to the pipeline operator on many *NIX systems. As usual circuits are read from left to right similar to pipelines on *NIX systems: %\adjustbox{max width=\textwidth}{ \begin{lstlisting}[language=Python] In [1]: from pyqcs import CX, CZ, H, R, Z, X ...: from pyqcs import State ...: ...: state = State.new_zero_state(2) ...: ...: # This is the same as ...: # circuit = H(0) | CX(1, 0) ...: circuit = H(0) | H(1) | CZ(1, 0) | H(1) ...: ...: bell_state = circuit * state In [2]: bell_state Out[2]: (0.7071067811865477+0j)*|0b0> + (0.7071067811865477+0j)*|0b11> \end{lstlisting} %} A quick way to generate circuits programatically is to use the \lstinline{list_to_circuit} function: %\adjustbox{max width=\textwidth}{ \begin{lstlisting}[language=Python] In [1]: from pyqcs import CX, CZ, H, R, Z, X ...: from pyqcs import State, list_to_circuit ...: ...: circuit_CX = list_to_circuit([CX(i, i-1) for i in range(1, 5)]) ...: ...: state = (H(0) | circuit_CX) * State.new_zero_state(5) In [2]: state Out[2]: (0.7071067811865476+0j)*|0b0> + (0.7071067811865476+0j)*|0b11111> \end{lstlisting} %} \subsection{Graphical State Simulation} \subsubsection{Graphical States}