diff --git a/thesis/chapters/stabilizer.tex b/thesis/chapters/stabilizer.tex
index 5c16891..4af95de 100644
--- a/thesis/chapters/stabilizer.tex
+++ b/thesis/chapters/stabilizer.tex
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ the elements of $P$ either commute or anticommute.
     For $n$ qbits
 
     \begin{equation}
-        P_n := \{\bigotimes\limits_{i=0}^{n-1} p_i | p_i \in P\}
+        P_n := \left\{\bigotimes\limits_{i=0}^{n-1} p_i | p_i \in P\right\}
     \end{equation}
 
     is called the multilocal Pauli group on $n$ qbits. 
@@ -204,4 +204,94 @@ product of $n$ Pauli matrices. This has led to the simulation using stabilizer t
 \cite{gottesman_aaronson2008}.
 
 Interestingly also measurements are dynamics covered by the stabilizers.
-When an observable $g_i \in \{\pm X_i, \pm Y_i \pm Z_i\}$ is measured
+When an observable $g_a \in \{\pm X_a, \pm Y_a \pm Z_a\}$ acting on qbit $a$ is measured
+one has to consider the projector
+
+\begin{equation}
+    P_{g_a,s} = \frac{I + (-1)^s g_a}{2} 
+\end{equation}
+
+If now $g_a$ commutes with all $S^{(i)}$ a result of $s=0$ is measured with probability $1$
+and the stabilizers are left unchanged:
+
+\begin{equation}
+    \begin{aligned}
+        \ket{\psi'} &= \frac{I + g_a}{2}\ket{\psi} \\
+                    &= \frac{I + g_a}{2}S^{(i)} \ket{\psi} \\
+                    &= S^{(i)} \frac{I + g_a}{2}\ket{\psi} \\
+                    &= S^{(i)}\ket{\psi'} \\
+    \end{aligned}
+\end{equation}
+
+As the state that is stabilized by $S$ is unique $\ket{\psi'} = \ket{\psi}$.
+
+If $g_a$ does not commute with all stabilizers the following lemma gives 
+the result of the measurement.
+
+\begin{lemma}
+    \label{lemma:stab_measurement}
+    Let $J := \{ S^{(i)} | [g_a, S^{(i)}] \neq 0\} \neq \{\}$. When measuring 
+    $\frac{I + (-1)^s g_a}{2} $
+    $1$ and $0$ are obtained with probability $\frac{1}{2}$ and after choosing
+    a $j \in J$ the new state $\ket{\psi'}$ is stabilized by 
+    \begin{equation}
+        \langle \{(-1)^s g_a\} \cup \{S^{(i)} S^{(j)} | S^{(i)} \in J \setminus \{S^{(j)}\} \} \cup J^c\rangle
+    \end{equation}
+\end{lemma}
+
+\begin{proof}
+    As $g_a$ is a Pauli operator and $S^{(i)} \in J$ are multi-local Pauli operators,
+    $S^{(i)}$ and $g_a$ anticommute. Choose a $S^{(j)} \in J$. Then
+
+    \begin{equation}
+    \begin{aligned}
+        P(s=+1) &= \hbox{Tr}\left(\frac{I + g_a}{2}\ket{\psi}\bra{\psi}\right) \\
+                &= \hbox{Tr}\left(\frac{I + g_a}{2}S^{(j)} \ket{\psi}\bra{\psi}\right)\\
+                &= \hbox{Tr}\left(S^{(j)}\frac{I - g_a}{2}\ket{\psi}\bra{\psi}\right)\\
+                &= \hbox{Tr}\left(\frac{I - g_a}{2}\ket{\psi}\bra{\psi}S^{(j)}\right)\\
+                &= \hbox{Tr}\left(\frac{I - g_a}{2}\ket{\psi}\bra{\psi}\right)\\
+                &= P(s=-1)
+    \end{aligned}
+    \notag
+    \end{equation}
+
+    With $P(s=+1) + P(s=-1) = 1$ follows $P(s=+1) = \frac{1}{2} = P(s=-1)$.
+    Further for $S^{(i)},S^{(j)} \in J$
+
+    \begin{equation}
+    \begin{aligned}
+        \frac{I + (-1)^sg_a}{2}\ket{\psi} &= \frac{I + (-1)^sg_a}{2}S^{(j)}S^{(i)} \ket{\psi} \\
+            &= S^{(j)}\frac{I + (-1)^{s + 1}g_a}{2}S^{(i)} \ket{\psi} \\
+            &=  S^{(j)}S^{(i)}\frac{I + (-1)^{s + 2}g_a}{2}\ket{\psi} \\
+            &=  S^{(j)}S^{(i)}\frac{I + (-1)^sg_a}{2}\ket{\psi}
+    \end{aligned}
+    \notag
+    \end{equation}
+
+    the state after measurement is stabilized by $S^{(j)}S^{(i)}$ $i,j \in J$, and by 
+    $S^{(i)} \in J^c$. $(-1)^sg_a$ trivially stabilizes $\ket{\psi'}$.
+\end{proof}
+
+\subsection{The VOP-free Graph States}
+
+This section will discuss the vertex operator(VOP)-free graph states. Why they are called
+vertex operator-free will be clear in the following section about graph states.
+
+\begin{definition}
+    The tuple $(V, E)$ is called a graph iff $V$ is a set of vertices with $|V| = n \in \mathbb{N}$.
+    In the following $V = \{0, ..., n-1\}$ will be used.
+    $E$ is the set of edges $E = \left\{\{i, j\} | i,i \in V, i \neq j\right\}$.
+\end{definition}
+
+This definition of a graph is way less general than the definition of a mathematical graph.
+Using this definition will however allow to avoid an extensive list of constraints on the 
+mathematical graph that are implied in this definition.
+
+\begin{definition}
+    For a graph $G = (V = \{0, ..., n-1\}, E)$ the associated stabilizers are 
+    \begin{equation}
+        K_G^{(i)} := X_i \prod\limits_{\{i,j\} \in E} Z_i
+    \end{equation}
+    for all $i \in V$. The vertex operator free graph state $\ket{\bar{G}}$ is the state stabilized by 
+    $\langle K_G^{(i)} \rangle_{i = 0, ..., n-1}$.
+\end{definition}